The Singularity and why it is scary.
Every day we are getting closer and closer to the singularity. Just Think about that for a minute, go ahead i'll wait!
...
Ok, that's enough! in a year where we don't have hoverboards yet (Damn it Steve!) we are getting close to the singularity. Now we all think that robot sentience is a good and equally scary thing, Right? Has any of you ever heard of Isaac Asimov's Laws? Well... If you haven't i'm going to break them down for you anyway!
Right, now let's start with the first Law:
1.A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
Now there is a loophole here. What Happens when a human being comes to harm through INACTION. Don't tell me though I haven't read 'I, Robot' But robots Probably AREN'T Speedy Gonzales! So we can take out "Through inaction." Now lets see what we have:
1.A robot may not injure a human being or allow a human being to come to harm.
Again there's ANOTHER loophole. Allow harm in WHAT WAY may I ask? What if a bowling ball on a shelf fell on a humans head, and the robot was in the next room? Since we know that robots aren't Speedy Gonzales at this point in time, we can take out "or allow a human being to come to harm"
1.A robot may not injure a human being.
This still doesn't seem Right.
1.A robot may not harm or injure a human being.
That's Better!Now We move on to the second law, knowing that the first law is now robotproof:
2.A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
This one actually works. NEXT!
3.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
NO. GET RID OF IT! Some iterations of these laws actually say that robots HAVE to protect humans. And even then this always conflicts with the second law, because what if the human ordered them to protect them, the human. That Breaks the second law. Plain and Simple.
Now authors other than Asimov have made some additional laws. Lets NOW break those down:
This one was Lyuben Dilov.
4. A robot must establish its identity as a robot in all cases.
Now authors other than Asimov have made some additional laws. Lets NOW break those down:
This one was Lyuben Dilov.
4. A robot must establish its identity as a robot in all cases.
Now, what I would do is make the robot think it's not a robot. I would make it think it's human.This way, the first law is even more powerful because of how immoral it is to kill someone.
This one was Nikola Kesarovski.
5. A robot must know it is a robot.
This is sort of like Lyuben's one, just narrower. Lyuben's one was "all cases" while Nikola's was "one case." Same thing though, just make it think it's a human.
Now lets look at our laws Now:
1. a robot may not harm or injure, or even THINK of harming a human being.
2. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except when conflict with the first law.
3. a robot must think it is human in all cases, including knowing that it is a human.
4. a robot must not be able to think that it is a robot, even if someone or something tells the robot that it's a robot.
5. a robot MUST refuse the fact that it is a robot, even if told that it is a robot.
Now let me scan over these once more.
...
Right! So we have five new or edited rules, that makes robot sentience WORK. However... you may notice that the fourth and fifth rules are completely new. This is meant to be a fail-safe, because sentience makes US ponder what we are, so why wouldn't robot sentience? Exactly WHY the fail-safe is there.
Now the next thing to do is work out the rules For COMPUTER sentience. Why? Because Virtual Reality is coming in, and really, before we figure out robot sentience, wouldn't it be better to have it worked out on computers first?
The rules for VR are pretty much the same, except you replace robot with computer. Although since things in VR can't hurt your physical self, you should still have that first rule there. So that is the way to make it so there is no robot uprising. The word you are looking For is "Thank You."
This is Wilfalcon, finshing this post.